Communities: Regulatory & Compliance

Survey: Court Hearings Don’t Move Public Opinion On Health Law

By Jordan Rau, Kaiser Health News

The three days in March that the Supreme Court devoted to debating the health law didn’t change many minds among the public. But the debate, and related media coverage, appear to have increased awareness about the law and made Republicans more supportive of the justices, according to
a new survey.

As it has for two years, the public remained divided over the law when they were surveyed a week after the arguments ended, according to the latest survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation. (KHN is an editorially-independent program of the foundation.) According to the poll, 50 percent of American said they were “very or fairly” closely following the court case, up from 37 percent in March.

The extensive focus during the court hearings on the individual mandate may have also led to a greater understanding of that provision of the law: 74 percent of Americans were aware it was part of the law, up from 64 percent before the court’s hearing. The mandate, which would require all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a fine, remains unpopular among the public. Less than one-third of those surveyed feel favorably about it. That barely changed from March.

Some justices’ skepticism about the law as expressed during its hearings appears to have increased Republican confidence in the court. The percent of Republicans who said they had “a great deal” or “quite a lot” of confidence in the court jumped from 24 to 43, while the percent of Democrats with that degree of faith was at 29 percent, a statistically-insignificant increase of 1 percentage point. Overall, 31 percent of respondents expressed a great deal of confidence in the court.

Republicans also showed growing confidence that the justices would rely on legal analysis rather than their own political leanings in determining the constitutional fate of the law, according to the poll.  

In March, one third of Republicans thought the justices’ own political views would determine the court’s decision, while only 19 percent believed the justices would rely on their analysis and interpretation of the law. After the hearing, those views essentially flipped: 39 percent of Republicans thought the justices would apply legal analysis, while just 19 percent thought they would follow their political instincts, the poll found.

The poll was conducted April 4 to April 10, the week after the court’s oral arguments. The pollsters surveyed 1,210 adults. The margin of error was plus or minus 3 percentage points.

More Policy & Legislation Articles

How Washington and U.S. Employers Can Help Make Connected Care our Future

As health care costs in the U.S. continue to rise, employers are looking for new ways to enhance health care offerings that complement traditional insurance while providing employees with access to benefits that can increase wellness, reduce absenteeism and improve worker productivity.

Regulatory Delay and Uncertainty Harming Small Business

Acting on his own authority, the president has again suspended the employer mandate for certain businesses until 2016. Most observers, especially those sympathetic to the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) goals, consider the president’s exercise of executive power benign. Even the Republicans have been calling for delay, so why complain about

Welcome to the Future: The “Sorting Hat” Businesses

At the December 2013 IHC FORUM West conference, I had an interesting discussion with several experts in the private exchange arena: In ten years, what will be the relationship between public and private exchanges?

Final Regulations: Group Health Plan 90-Day Waiting Period Limitation

Bachman's Banter: Employer plan sponsors should consult with their agent, broker, plan consultant, legal counsel or human resources department to assure they are in compliance with the waiting period requirements. You should also be sure you qualify for and follow the specific rules for an waiting periods beyond 90 days.

Requests for permissions to reuse content contact Copyright Clearance Center at info@copyright.com

Comments


Connect With Us!FacebookTwitterLinkedInIHC FORUM BlogRSS
Member LoginTerms of UseSite Map

©2013 The Institute for HealthCare Consumerism